{"id":865,"date":"2014-10-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2014-10-14T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\/"},"modified":"2020-04-30T10:51:58","modified_gmt":"2020-04-30T10:51:58","slug":"a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/en\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\/","title":{"rendered":"A time to nourish? Evaluating The Impact of Defense-related Procurement on Technological Generality through Patent Data"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Article by Emilio Raiteri.<\/p>\n<p>Work to be presented at the <a title=\"Defence R&amp;D and Innovation Working Group\" href=\"https:\/\/economie-defense.fr\/groupe-travail-rd-innovation-defense\/\">Defence R&amp;D and Innovation working group<\/a>, Thursday 13 November 2014.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Abstract<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\nThe idea that demand might be a major source of innovation dates back to the contribution of<br \/>\nSchmookler(1962, 1966) and Kaldor(1966). Despite the slowdown in the study of this relation due to<br \/>\nthe critics by Mowery and Rosenberg(1979), the demand side approach has recently regained attention.<br \/>\nWith the resurrection of the demand side also the debate on the role of public demand has been re-<br \/>\nvitalized. Innovative public procurement has been increasingly considered as a form of public support<br \/>\nto private innovation activities both from innovation scholars and policy makers (Edler and Georghiou<br \/>\n2007), grounding the need for demand oriented innovation policy.<br \/>\nEconomic historians suggested an even more fundamental role for public procurement in setting the<br \/>\npace of technological change, acknowledging government demand as a crucial factor in developing some<br \/>\nof the most in uential technologies of the 20th century. In particular Ruttan (2006) and Mowery (2008,<br \/>\n2011) report how U.S. military and aerospace related procurement had a major impact for the emergence<br \/>\nand di usion of so called general purpose technologies (GPT) such as semiconductors, computing and<br \/>\nthe internet. GPTs are usually considered as engines of economic growth, fostering widespread produc-<br \/>\ntivity gains through massive relocation and reorganization of the economic activity. According to the<br \/>\nGPT literature this potential growth is achieved only if the virtuous cycle of innovation complementar-<br \/>\nities is triggered between the sector that unveils the new technology (upstream sector) and the sectors<br \/>\napplying the new technology (downstream). Technological levels of the upstream and downstream sec-<br \/>\ntors are hence strategic complements and widespread di usion stems from the coordination of beliefs<br \/>\nbetween GPT producer and application sectors (Bresnahan and Trajtenberg, 1995). Coordination fail-<br \/>\nures and larger uncertainty tied to drastic innovations may therefore provide little market incentives for<br \/>\nadoption in the downstream sectors, potentially leaving an economy locked-in on inferior technological<br \/>\ntrajectories . Bresnahan and Trajtenberg (1995) already suggested that public procurement may play a<br \/>\nvery important role to overcome this potential market failure, injecting the virtuous cycle of innovation<br \/>\ncomplementarities.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\nDespite the economic historians\u2019 contributions and Bresnahan and Trajtenberg's suggestion, no em-<br \/>\npirical work has so far tried to nd evidence of the link between public procurement and technological<br \/>\ngenerality. This paper tries to ll this gap. Following the intuition provided by Bresnahan and Trajten-<br \/>\nberg (1995) and conceiving the arrival of a GPT \u00abas a process unfolding in time rather than a single<br \/>\nhomogeneous shock\u00bb (Cantner and Vannuccini, 2012), I surmise that procurement might represent one of<br \/>\nthe most important element in creating the right soil to \u00ab cultivate \u00bb a technology that may (or may not)<br \/>\nhave the potential to reach high levels of pervasiveness. I will hence hypothesize that public procurement<br \/>\ncan raise the degree of generality of upstream technologies, triggering innovation complementarities in<br \/>\nthe downstream sectors for which the market is not providing su cient incentives.<\/p>\n<p>To empirically test this hypothesis I make use of patent data and in particular of patent citations.<br \/>\nCitations can be considered as \u2018paper trail\u2019 of the linkages between an innovation and its technological<br \/>\n\u2018antecedents\u2019 and \u2018descendants\u2019 (Trajtenberg et al. 1997). This feature allows to: i) use patent citations<br \/>\nto identify the connection between innovations related to public procurement and their antecedents; ii)<br \/>\nmeasure generality of patents looking at the extent to which the follow-up technical advances are spread<br \/>\nacross di erent technological elds through a Generality Index (Trajtenberg et al. 1997; Hall, 2002) 1.<br \/>\nOn the basis of this 2 consideration the hypothesis stated above can be expressed in a more formal way,<br \/>\nI will in fact hypothesize that receiving a citation from a patent related to public procurement raises the<br \/>\ngenerality level of the cited patent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\nTo perform the analysis we exploit data from 3 di erent sources: i) NBER patent data project that<br \/>\ncollects data for patents granted by the USPTO in the period 1976-20062, together with citations data; ii)<br \/>\nFederal Procurement Data System (FPDS),3 which includes several pieces of information for each Federal contract<br \/>\nawarded from 2000 onwards; iii) the Compustat North America Database which gathers nancial and<br \/>\nmarket information on public companies in the U.S. .<br \/>\nI hence design a quasi experiment in which we compare the change in the generality level (measured<br \/>\nthrough the Generality Index) at two di erent points in time, 1999 and 2006, between treated and<br \/>\na control patents, whose application date falls in the period 1993-1997 and who received at least 10<br \/>\nforward citations in 2006. Public procurement is the treatment variable and, in particular, a patent is<br \/>\nput into the treatment group if it receives a citation from a patent related to public procurement in scal<br \/>\nyear 2000.<br \/>\nIn order to deem a patent as \u2018related to public procurement\u2019 I rely on 2 considerations: i) U.S.<br \/>\nlaws: the regulation states that a patent for an invention made by a contractor in the performance of<br \/>\nwork under a government contract should include a \u2018Government interest statement\u2019. ii) I Aggregate<br \/>\nprocurement contracts data for scal year 2000 at the rm level and then match them through entities<br \/>\nnames with USPTO patents whose priority date falls in year 1999-2000 (NBER- patent data project).<br \/>\nA patent is then considered as \u2018related to public procurement\u2019 if it belongs to a rm who won at least a<br \/>\nprocurement contract in scal year 2000 and if it includes the \u2018Government interest statement\u2019.<br \/>\nTaking simple di erence in averages of the change in the Generality Index among 1999 and 2006<br \/>\nbetween the treated and control group of patents would lead to biased results due to multiple endogeneity<br \/>\nissues (mainly selection bias). To mitigate the bias we hence use as control patents only patents that<br \/>\nare similar to the ones in the treated group along several dimensions (as it was done by Czarnitki et.<br \/>\nal., 2011 and Fier and Pyka 2012). I therefore adopt the conditional di erence-in-di erences approach<br \/>\n(Heckman et al., 1998). As a rst step I use propensity score matching method to tackle the selection<br \/>\non observables problem, estimating the propensity score through a probit regression on several patents\u2019<br \/>\nand assignees\u2019 characteristics. Once that the matching is implemented I use di erence-in-di erence to<br \/>\neliminate potential biases due to selection on unobservables.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\nPreliminary results of the average treatment e ect provided by the CDiD approach suggest a positive<br \/>\nand signi cant impact of innovative public procurement upon the generality of a patent. In particular,<br \/>\non average receiving a citation by a patent related to public procurement raises the Generality Index<br \/>\nof a 4%, con rming the initial hypothesis. Public demand seems hence to be of crucial importance<br \/>\nin increasing the pervasiveness of a technology, calling for the need of Schumpeterian demand policies<br \/>\n(Antonelli, 2009).<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Article de Emilio Raiteri. Travail qui sera pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 au sein du groupe de travail R&amp;D et Innovation d\u00e9fense, le jeudi 13 novembre 2014. &nbsp; Abstract The idea that demand might be a major source of innovation dates back to the contribution of Schmookler(1962, 1966) and Kaldor(1966). Despite the slowdown in the study of this relation [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":564,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[360],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-865","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-actualites-du-reseau"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>A time to nourish? Evaluating The Impact of Defense-related Procurement on Technological Generality through Patent Data - Chaire \u00c9conomie de d\u00e9fense - IHEDN<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/en\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A time to nourish? Evaluating The Impact of Defense-related Procurement on Technological Generality through Patent Data - Chaire \u00c9conomie de d\u00e9fense - IHEDN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Article de Emilio Raiteri. Travail qui sera pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 au sein du groupe de travail R&amp;D et Innovation d\u00e9fense, le jeudi 13 novembre 2014. &nbsp; Abstract The idea that demand might be a major source of innovation dates back to the contribution of Schmookler(1962, 1966) and Kaldor(1966). Despite the slowdown in the study of this relation [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/en\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Chaire \u00c9conomie de d\u00e9fense - IHEDN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-10-14T00:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-04-30T10:51:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/ecole-militaire-paris-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"755\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"414\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"dev\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Chaire_Ecodef\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Chaire_Ecodef\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"dev\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"dev\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7b3f1a2d8fd336e0be2f9ff63ff0ebbc\"},\"headline\":\"A time to nourish? Evaluating The Impact of Defense-related Procurement on Technological Generality through Patent Data\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-10-14T00:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-04-30T10:51:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1123,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/ecole-militaire-paris-1.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Actualit\u00e9s du r\u00e9seau\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\\\/\",\"name\":\"A time to nourish? Evaluating The Impact of Defense-related Procurement on Technological Generality through Patent Data - Chaire \u00c9conomie de d\u00e9fense - IHEDN\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/ecole-militaire-paris-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-10-14T00:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-04-30T10:51:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/ecole-militaire-paris-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/02\\\/ecole-militaire-paris-1.jpg\",\"width\":755,\"height\":414},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A time to nourish? Evaluating The Impact of Defense-related Procurement on Technological Generality through Patent Data\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Chaire \u00c9conomie de D\u00e9fense - IHEDN\",\"description\":\"Produire &amp; soutenir, f\u00e9d\u00e9rer &amp; diffuser, \u00eatre une interface\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Chaire \u00c9conomie de d\u00e9fense - IHEDN\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/04\\\/logoEcodef9.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/04\\\/logoEcodef9.jpg\",\"width\":410,\"height\":212,\"caption\":\"Chaire \u00c9conomie de d\u00e9fense - IHEDN\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Chaire_Ecodef\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/chaire-ecodef-ihedn\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7b3f1a2d8fd336e0be2f9ff63ff0ebbc\",\"name\":\"dev\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f1ffcac9ca2fa95ad3ec33e9be3ade82f752acb0cabe541e56c5889225afa88a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f1ffcac9ca2fa95ad3ec33e9be3ade82f752acb0cabe541e56c5889225afa88a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f1ffcac9ca2fa95ad3ec33e9be3ade82f752acb0cabe541e56c5889225afa88a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"dev\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\\\/en\\\/author\\\/dev\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A time to nourish? Evaluating The Impact of Defense-related Procurement on Technological Generality through Patent Data - Chaire \u00c9conomie de d\u00e9fense - IHEDN","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/en\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"A time to nourish? Evaluating The Impact of Defense-related Procurement on Technological Generality through Patent Data - Chaire \u00c9conomie de d\u00e9fense - IHEDN","og_description":"Article de Emilio Raiteri. Travail qui sera pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 au sein du groupe de travail R&amp;D et Innovation d\u00e9fense, le jeudi 13 novembre 2014. &nbsp; Abstract The idea that demand might be a major source of innovation dates back to the contribution of Schmookler(1962, 1966) and Kaldor(1966). Despite the slowdown in the study of this relation [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/en\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\/","og_site_name":"Chaire \u00c9conomie de d\u00e9fense - IHEDN","article_published_time":"2014-10-14T00:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-04-30T10:51:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":755,"height":414,"url":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/ecole-militaire-paris-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"dev","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Chaire_Ecodef","twitter_site":"@Chaire_Ecodef","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"dev","Estimated reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\/"},"author":{"name":"dev","@id":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/#\/schema\/person\/7b3f1a2d8fd336e0be2f9ff63ff0ebbc"},"headline":"A time to nourish? Evaluating The Impact of Defense-related Procurement on Technological Generality through Patent Data","datePublished":"2014-10-14T00:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2020-04-30T10:51:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\/"},"wordCount":1123,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/ecole-militaire-paris-1.jpg","articleSection":["Actualit\u00e9s du r\u00e9seau"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\/","url":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\/","name":"A time to nourish? Evaluating The Impact of Defense-related Procurement on Technological Generality through Patent Data - Chaire \u00c9conomie de d\u00e9fense - IHEDN","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/ecole-militaire-paris-1.jpg","datePublished":"2014-10-14T00:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2020-04-30T10:51:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/ecole-militaire-paris-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/ecole-militaire-paris-1.jpg","width":755,"height":414},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/a-time-to-nourish-evaluating-the-impact-of-defense-related-procurement-on-technological-generality-through-patent-data\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A time to nourish? Evaluating The Impact of Defense-related Procurement on Technological Generality through Patent Data"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/","name":"Chair in Defence Economics - IHEDN","description":"Produce &amp; support, federate &amp; disseminate, act as an interface","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/#organization","name":"Chair in Defence Economics - IHEDN","url":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/logoEcodef9.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/logoEcodef9.jpg","width":410,"height":212,"caption":"Chaire \u00c9conomie de d\u00e9fense - IHEDN"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/x.com\/Chaire_Ecodef","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/chaire-ecodef-ihedn\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/#\/schema\/person\/7b3f1a2d8fd336e0be2f9ff63ff0ebbc","name":"dev","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1ffcac9ca2fa95ad3ec33e9be3ade82f752acb0cabe541e56c5889225afa88a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1ffcac9ca2fa95ad3ec33e9be3ade82f752acb0cabe541e56c5889225afa88a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f1ffcac9ca2fa95ad3ec33e9be3ade82f752acb0cabe541e56c5889225afa88a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"dev"},"url":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/en\/author\/dev\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/865","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=865"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/865\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1236,"href":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/865\/revisions\/1236"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/564"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=865"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=865"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ecodef-ihedn.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=865"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}